NOM’s Tour Mastermind NOW SUPPORTS CIVIL MARRIAGE EQUALITY!

LOUIS MARINELLI NOW SUPPORTS

OUR CIVIL MARRIAGE EQUALITY!

Yes, you read that correctly. While still not in full support of homosexuality on some levels (where he needs our help to correct misinformation), Louis is now [a] repudiating virtually all of the vitriol that he put on the public record; [b] is owning up to the major role that he’s played with NOM, including admitting that he was the impetus behind the whole summer tour; and [c] is coming out in full support of the civil marriage rights that gay people are seeking. And even more important that that: He, the man who gave NOM its official “protect marriage” Facebook page and who has been working as an independent contractor with the org. ever since (and still is, reporting directly to Brian Brown, at least up until the moment this post goes live)quite literally credits exposure to the NOM tour as the very thing that led to his change of heart!!!!!


NOM’S TOUR MASTERMIND,

FACEBOOK FOUNDER,

AND ONLINE STRATEGIST,

LOUIS MARINELLI, NOW SUPPORTS

OUR CIVIL MARRIAGE EQUALITY!

THE MUCH-BALLYHOOED SUMMER

MARRIAGE TOUR 2010

OPENED HIS EYES! 


Source: HERE! Click through for more information, including an interview with Louis!

Rhode Island Hate-Crime Legislation: Gender ID/Expression Bill

My apologies for being late in putting up more Stop Porn Culture! Conference posts, but they’re coming, I promise. Right now, though, I have to talk about some even MORE local news (well, local if you’re in Rhode Island): the recent vetoing by RI Governor Carcieri* of an important bill (House Bill 7044/Senate Bill 2055) that would add “gender identity and expression**” to RI’s hate crimes statute.

“Gender identity and expression” was part of the Matthew Sheppard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which President Obama signed into law on October 28, 2009. However, without local legislation to support it, there isn’t much actual change effected.

Carcieri vetoed the measure (even though it has been passed in the House and Senate by overwhelming majorities) because he said the law already addresses actions “motivated by racial, religious, sexual orientation, gender or disability prejudice.” He obviously doesn’t understand the issue (uh, hello, having “gender” and “sexual orientation” doesn’t cover it!) and the importance of this bill, even though many have personally reached out to him and his associates to educate him, so I hope that this blog post educates you. Furthermore, I hope it inspires you to action.

What does this bill do?

  1. Includes information about gender ID/expression in the free, mandatory training for police officers so they can better identify, respond to, and report all incidents of hate crimes
  2. Expands the definition of a hate-crime (adds gender identity and expression)
  3. Requires statistics on crimes motivated by gender identity/expression-related bias to be kept by the RI police

This bill does NOT enhance penalties (read: it does not mean a longer jail sentence for someone who commits this type of crime).

Whom does this bill help?

This bill would help protect EVERYONE in Rhode Island who could possibly be attacked due to a perception about their appearance as it relates to their gender. The people who are usually most at risk of being targeted/attacked due to their gender identity and/or expression are transgender and non-conformingly-gendered individuals, but this bill helps ALL of us. So, honestly, if you don’t care about queer rights, at least care about yourself and the folks in your life.

Why is this bill important?

As it stands, we CANNOT GATHER INFORMATION about these types of crimes, and that data is crucial in helping us tackle the issue. It would, in the long-run, help us create a safer, more just place for all people. Furthermore, many “gay-bashings” are actually committed due to a person’s gender performance or perceived identity; it’s more likely someone will be harassed for not conforming to gender norms (e.g. effeminate man in dress) than for actually BEING queer in their sexual orientation (these don’t have clear visible markers). Thus, we need to address this as an important part of hate-crime legislation.

What is the opposition doing?

Rallying around this veto as a success. The Family Research Council’s president, Tony Perkins said:

“Given the challenges facing America, it’s troubling that any legislature would invest time and taxpayer monies to consider such a superfluous agenda-driven maneuver, much less pass it through both Houses. In vetoing the measures, Gov. Carcieri rightly chose to tend to the serious business of governing Rhode Island and rejected those who seek to use government resources against anyone who would oppose their radical agenda.”

Oh, right. Harassment and violence against people due to their gender presentation and/or identity is not SERIOUS ENOUGH.

Another thing the opposition is doing? Making it all an issue about gay marriage. For some reason, ANYTHING that people to do further LGBTQ rights and protect the dignity of all citizens gets chalked up to “The Gay Agenda.” Also, somehow, it’s ALL about marriage (and/or making everyone gay, “corrupting the youth,” “devaluing the family,” or some other ridiculous thing).

More examples of such idiocy? Focus on the Family Action’s CitizenLink.com quotes Christopher Plante as saying:

“From NOM’s perspective, we were deeply concerned about this bill, because we have seen similar (hate crime) legislation – in places like Connecticut and Vermont – lead directly to the imposition of same-sex marriage. Laws like this are stepping stones to homosexual marriage. They are an erosion of traditional family values.”

So what can you do now?

  • Tell your friends about it. EDUCATE PEOPLE. Spread the word.
  • Attend a press conference that will happen next week at the RI State-House. It’ll be either July 8th or 9th (Thursday or Friday) in the 1:00-2:00pm  range. I’ll update this post as soon as I have more information.
  • Get in touch with people/groups that are working on this (and related stuff) and MAKE A DIFFERENCE!
    • Victor Ellingsen: Lifelines Rhode Island (victor@lifelinesri.org)
    • Jodi Glass: Hate Crimes RI (contact@hatecrimeri.org; jglass53@aol.com)
    • Susan Heroux: Queer Action Rhode Island (susanheroux@me.com)
    • Jaye Watts: Youth Pride Inc. (jaye@youthprideri.org)
    • Providence Equality Action Committee (info@peac.us.com)
    • Marriage Equality Rhode Island (marriageequality.rhodeisland@gmail.com)

*Who is Governor Carcieri (as it relates to LGBTQ rights)? Carcieri, whose term ends in January, has a controversial history with LGBT voters. He gave a speech at an antigay group’s fund-raiser saying he did not believe marriage was a civil right. In 2009 he vetoed a bill giving domestic partners the right to make funeral arrangements for one another, though the general assembly overrode the veto. He has also pledged to turn down any marriage equality bills, despite several of Rhode Island’s neighboring states passing such legislation in recent years (source: The Advocate).

**Gender Identity or Expression, as defined already in RI General Law 11-24-2.1, “includes a person’s actual or perceived gender, as well as a person’s gender identity, gender-related self image, gender-related appearance, or gender-related expression; whether or not that gender identity, gender-related self image, gender-related appearance, or gender-related expression is different from that traditionally associated with the person’s sex at birth.”

Spreading the Intolerance





Some things I hate:
  • Outdated job listings
  • Programs freezing and then losing all my information
  • Surinam toads
  • Organizations that misrepresent the issues.
Organizations that HIDE their true motives and cloud people’s judgment with ambiguous wording.

Why, yes, I’m in favor of life and marriage and families. So am I in favor of the Family Research Council’s New England Family, Life and Marriage Summit on Saturday? Absolutely not. Because these events are not actually in favor of simply “family, life, and marriage,” they are in favor of a heteronormative, heterosexual, anti-choice style of family, life, and marriage. They do NOT represent me, and what they do represent is an oppressive regime that doesn’t allow for diversity, flexibility, and love; they represent and create a society where we hate rather that tolerate. Hosted by the National Organization for Marriage, discussion topics at this summit include gems like “Homosexuality In Your Child’s Public Schools” and “Engaging Students In Pro-Family Activism.” 


Mike Airhart of Truth Wins Out put it nicely:


“These groups claim to support the family, but not before they fire gay workers, drive gay spouses into hiding, eliminate the constitutional rights of gay Americans, deny sex education to teenagers who then become pregnant, injure people through discredited and involuntary ‘ex-gay’ therapy, and leave thousands of ruined marriages, separated couples, and unadopted children in their wake.”


So get involved and join the peaceful protest against this summit and its mission!


  1. Check out the article on Providence Daily Dose and the flyer for the event, as well as another article.
  2. Check out the Facebook event created by QPAC, the Queer Political Action Committee at Brown University.
  3. Go to the protest! Feel free to bring homemade signs and other stuff, as long as it’s all respectful and non-violent.

Now, to repost Queer Action RI’s message

Please join us:
Date: Saturday, February 27, 2010
Time: 3:00pm – 5:00 pm
Location: Behind Ocean State Baptist Church, 600 Douglas Pike, Smithfield, RI

Please carpool if possible – there isn’t much parking. Park at the public school behind the church and join your fellow Rhode Islanders in saying no to discrimination! 


Queer Action urges other groups to join our rally by advertising it to your members and attending. If you’d like to co-sponsor with Queer Action, please contact Susan Heroux, Public Relations Coordinator, at queeractionri@gmail.com

The Family Research Council is currently working to keep “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” alive in our military with this web site headline: “Prevent the Sexualization of our Armed Forces.” They have a pamphlet on “myths and facts” about abortion which says: “Myth: The more people have access to contraception, the fewer abortions there will be,” followed by: “Fact: More contraception leads to more sexual behavior, more unintended pregnancies, and more abortion.”

See here for information on the conferenceThis will be a very difficult conference to attend so please don’t unless you feel you can be respectful. Queer Action has no intention or plan to interrupt this conference. In keeping with our values, we will protest non-violently outside the event and be seen by participants leaving the event. We will alert the local media to our rally.

See here for more information on the Family Research Council, the Alliance Defense Fund, and the Massachusetts Family Institute (MFI).

Speaking at the event will be the head of the MFI – the group that Gov. Carcieri spoke to even though they have very anti-gay policies. Below is the list of speakers found online:

Cynthia Hill, Senior Director, State and Local Affairs, Family Research Council




  • Kris Mineau, Executive Director, Massachusetts Family Institute
  • Peter Wolfgang, Executive Director, Family Institute of Connecticut
  • Kevin Smith, Executive Director, Cornerstone Action of New Hampshire
  • Christopher Plante, Executive Director, National Organization for Marriage, Rhode Island
  • Shannon McGinley, Board Chairman, Cornerstone Action of New Hampshire
  • Connecticut Youth Wing, Students, Family Institute of Connecticut
  • Austin R. Nimocks, Senior Legal Counsel, Alliance Defense Fund
  • Dr. Pat Fagan, Family Research Council
  • Peter Sprigg, Senior Fellow for Policy Studies, Family Research Council

We want to celebrate that with you…unless you’re gay


Link to video of Maggie G. speaking @ the Aldrich Mansion (for NOM Family and Marriage Day Celebration in RI).

Dear Maggie,

You should look into the history of marriage before you speak.

Love, Aida

Anyhoo. The sad thing is that the beginning of this speech is pretty cute. Yeah, “we want to celebrate your loving union with you.” Unless you’re a same-sex couple, that is. Get your cooties off me!

Oh, and a little gem from the speech: as she was speaking about how marriage happens in basically every culture and blah blah blah, and it’s the union of one man and one woman, she goes “or at LEAST one man and one woman because *dismissive hand gesture* we know a bunch of small tribes believe in polygamy.”

Yikes.

Taking Responsibility, Corporate Style

BLOUNT RESPONDS TO QUESTIONS REGARDING AN EVENT SPONSORSHIP IN RHODE ISLAND.

FALL RIVER, MA (AUGUST 11, 2009) – Corporate philanthropy and good citizenship has been part of Blount’s mission since inception. In keeping with that, we have a long track record of donating Blount-brand chowder and other products to all non-profits in our home area that request it for events. These donations of soup are just simple gestures of goodwill and were certainly not intended to be interpreted otherwise. It’s very concerning to us that anyone would think otherwise and as a result, we are reviewing our policy going forward.

Additionally, Blount notified the organizers of the Rhode Island event in question that the company would not be providing a donation, soup or otherwise.

—————————-

I repeat: it impossible to construe donations for this event as “simple gestures of goodwill” with no ideological ramifications. If BFF gave donations to EVERY cause that sidled up asking for chowder and products, things would be different, but if they are actively picking and choosing who they donate to, that means they are exercising judgment of some sort and knowingly supporting whatever cause they are sponsoring. Being a sponsor of an event has its obligations and implications, and it’s not like NOM is an organization whose mission is not understood, so the mock surprise and concern on the part of Blount Fine Foods is kind of offensive.

But regardless of what Blount Fine Foods has ended up doing, the person I’m most pissed at is Christopher Plante–the Executive Director at NOM, Rhode Island Chapter. I personally believe Mr. Plante is a douchebag. That may be harsh, because I believe everyone has positive attributes…but when it comes to civil rights, respect of freedoms, and championing for justice and fairness? No. He fails. And he’s deceitful and deluded.

In relation to the Tim Horton’s lack of support after a media backlash, Plante said: “They rescinded the offer today as a direct result of the hubbub in Canada,” in this article. “This is an issue only north of the border.” Oh, my mistake. I thought this was an issue in the United States as well. *eyeroll* I don’t care if the local rep for Tim Horton’s approved supporting the event–the company’s policy states that the company “does not sponsor individuals, those representing religious groups, political affiliates, book endorsements or traveling sports teams.” Anyway, my biggest beef with him is because he is, like I said, deceitful and deluded and hypocritical. Let’s start looking at the blatant hipocrisy and ridiculousness, in 3 parts.

—————————-

PART ONE: THIS ISN’T RELIGIOUS OR POLITICAL…except it is.

The celebration will feature food, gospel/worship music, and a chance for couples to renew their wedding vows. It is described (on the event website) thusly: “This is a great opportunity to take a stand for marriage as God ordained it. Our goal is to esteem marriage to its proper place in society and make a statement that Christians in Rhode Island believe strongly in this cherished institution.” *AND YET* Plante says “My concern and my disappointment is that my event has been tainted as religious or political. Neither of those are correct. The event itself was not designed to be political, as a rally would be.” Furthermore, he states that “It’s held by an organization that, whatever you think of our politics, is not religious, we accept folks of all faiths and of no faith.

WHAT?

First of all, because the event isn’t “political as a rally would be” doesn’t mean it’s not political. Having a friendly little barbecue with people who share your beliefs is very different from having a big, advertised, sponsored event that actively seeks to further and celebrate the (VERY POLITICAL) missions of your organization.

Secondly, because you “accept people of all faiths and no faith” doesn’t mean it’s not religious (e.g. a religious/spiritual summit that caters to “everyone,” but is, oh, whaddya know, STILL RELIGIOUS).

And, finally, let’s review the National Organization for Marriage’s mission:

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is a nonprofit organization with a mission to protect marriage and the faith communities that sustain it. NOM works to develop political messaging, build its national grassroots email database of voters, and provide political intelligence and donor infrastructure on the state level, with a focus on developing new strategies for increasing influence in the Northeast and West Coast, where marriage is most under threat.

Nothing further with the witness, Your Honor. Hmph.

—————————-

PART TWO: EVERYONE IS WELCOME…except not really.

“We knew full well in opening this event to the public that we were inviting people who might oppose us,” says Plante. “If they choose to come and enjoy the food and beautiful venue, they’re more than welcome. They’re not welcome to come and protest. We’ll expect them to be respectful and treat us with dignity as we would do with them.”‘ Mmm, respect and dignity. I’d love to get some of that from all you NOM people. OH WAIT. You won’t give it to me. 😐

Plante’s main argument against the backlash Tim Horton’s and Blount Fine Foods received was based on the supposed fact that the event was “apolitical and non-religious” and that it was “open to everyone.” While the latter may TECHNICALLY be true, allowing queers to go to an event doesn’t mean they SHOULD go or that they’re HAPPILY INVITED or that they’re even WELCOME. It’s like telling a person of color “oh, hey, you can come to this nifty little KKK gathering.” Honestly. Come on, Plante. You’re not buying it and neither are we.

Plante said that gays and lesbians are welcome to attend the event, and added that if they want to, they may also rise to renew their vows. “If gays and lesbians want to come in with their children, they are more than welcome to come, and make sure they find me, and we’ll have a Coke and sit down and talk.”

What the article neglected to mention was that the queers could stand if they wanted, sure, but that the vows to be taken will be specific to man and woman, to celebrate heterosexual marriage and will not apply to same sex marriages at all. Like I said–allowing someone to attend and event is VERY different than WELCOMING them at it and making them feel comfortable. I’m fine with you having events for your organization (it’s within your right), but just don’t fucking LIE about them.

—————————-

PART THREE: THIS IS ALL ABOUT GAY BULLIES…except it’s not

In regards to Plante’s allegations that “This is about the organized approach to squash all private and public comments on marriage” and that Tim Horton’s had been “bullied by a vocal minority” into pulling out of an apolitical celebration that was “open to all,” including same-sex couples. *facepalm* This is not about squashing dialogue! This is about us asking a company to NOT GET INVOLVED AT ALL or at least OWN UP TO what they’re DOING. This is about us saying that, if they take this route of action, there will be consequences.

It’s within our right to boycott a company whose views we do not agree with, and I feel it’s a perfectly viable way to create pressure for change or just demonstrate our allegiances and funnel money to organizations whose values we agree with. It’s NOT okay for a company to support certain movements and not expect a backlash, and it’s COWARDLY for a company to support something and then back out of it because they fear losing money. I’d prefer a company that is open about the beliefs they espouse than one that flip-flops when the water in the pot starts getting hot. I mean, I’d prefer one that stays out of these debacles in general, or at least supports the side(s) that are all for dialogue and equality and fairness, but that may be asking for much.

“It’s stressful, it’s sorrowful, it’s saddening,” Plante said. “The marriage equality folks are making this a boycott threat. That’s sad. It has become our job now to remind Rhode Islanders that this is what’s to come.” Um…what does that last sentence even mean? Is he implying that we’re crazy gay bullies who will boycott everything we don’t agree with? Because, well, that’s probably true (save for the bullies part). It’s NOT true, however, that we’re bullying people into not having a right to express themselves.

Personally, I think this debate about marriage is totally ridiculous and shouldn’t be happening in the first place. An organization like NOM shouldn’t even exist. Why? Because this is not about agreeing with homosexuality or not–this is about EQUALITY and JUSTICE. Kind of like what Voltaire said: “I do not agree with what you have to say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.” I don’t care if you love me or hate me, but GIVE ME THE SAME RIGHTS. As a human being and citizen of this country, I’m entitled to them.

—————————-

And now, some ranting:

  • You know what I really FUCKING HATE? When people act victimized to gain sympathy. “Omg, halp, I’m a lil’ intolerant Christian douchebag and my religious rights are being taken away from me! Haaaaalp!” No. Your religious rights are not being taken away. Oh, and if by “religious rights” you mean “right to talk shit about others and advocate for inequality and intolerance and even hatred,” then I really think we need to redefine what “rights” mean. If you had half a brain cell you might realize this, but as long as you’re kissing the ass of the “Gathering Storm” ad and NOM and other organizations like it, you won’t notice. No one is taking your rights away by GRANTING RIGHTS TO OTHERS. This is the whole point of people fighting to allow same-sex couples to marry. One doesn’t even have to agree with homosexuality! One just has to agree with the ideals of equality and choice and freedom and civil rights/liberties.
  • Other things I hate–twisting language to gather sympathy and MANIPULATE THE TRUTH. Oh, I’m “pro-family” and “pro-marriage.” Guess what? Me too! But ohhhh, by pro-family you meant MOM AND DAD AND KIDS family and by pro-marriage you meant OPPOSITE-SEX PARTNER MARRIAGE. Oh, my bad. I thought we were on the same boat, being pro-family and pro-marriage and all, but I guess I was wrong. 😐 (That’s the reason why the pro-choice vs. pro-life labels annoy me a bit, but at least those labels make a little more sense.) That’s why I also think NOM’s name itself is stupid. No, you are not “pro-marriage,” you are pro keeping marriage as a solely male-female institution and keeping the links between specific religions and the state alive and well. You are pro denying same-sex couples the right to marry and get the same rights as opposite-sex couples. You are not pro-marriage; you are pro inequality. Let’s talk straight here (no pun intended) and actually say WHAT WE MEAN.

UPDATE: Student Action Required!

Jaykay. Blount JUST pulled out. 🙂 They haven’t made it public, however, (like I said, this JUST happened) and I’d like to see if they issue a statement. I mean, they SHOULD and probably will…but let’s see. I want to know their official stance on WHY they pulled out. I’d hate it if they just kept quiet about it all. Hmph. Also, it’s important to wait and see what they say because the email reply COULD be open to interpretation, y’know?

Truth Wins Out received the following e-mail from Larry Marchese, public relations representative for Blount Fine Foods of Fall River, Mass.

From: Larry Marchese
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:06 PM
To: Mike Airhart; Wayne Besen
Mike,
That is correct.
Larry
Sent from my handheld – please forgive typos
—–Original Message—–
From: Mike Airhart
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:59:44
To: Larry Marchese, Wayne Besen

Dear Larry,
Thank you very much for your communication. Are you stating officially that Blount Fine Foods is no longer providing cash or goods to National Organization for Marriage or its affiliates for the event in Warwick on August 16?
Many thanks in advance for any definitive clarification.

Mike Airhart
Truth Wins Out

Regardless–wee! The power of consumers + the internet rules. I can now continue to eat my delicious Blue Room New England clam chowder.
———————-

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is holding an anti-equality event in Providence this Sunday, August 16. NOM is one of the largest groups that is trying to prevent &/or overturn marriage equality. One of the sponsors of this event is Blount Fine Foods, who supplies Brown Dining Services with pre-made soups found in the Gate, Jo’s, and the Blue Room. We wanted to send an e-mail to BFF (lol, BFF) to let them know how we are not happy with the sponsorship of the group responsible for the “Gathering Storm” ad.

Upon receiving complaints about this, Larry Marchese said, on behalf of BFF:

“Corporate philanthropy and good citizenship has been part of Blount’s mission since inception. In keeping with that, we have a long track record of donating Blount-brand chowder and other products to a wide variety of non-profits in our home area that request it for events. These donations of soup are just simple gestures of goodwill and were certainly not intended to be interpreted otherwise. It’s very concerning to us that anyone would think otherwise and as a result, we will review our policy going forward.””

The following is my draft for the email we want to send to Blount Fine Foods. We also want to send it to the local media/newspapers and start circulating it to create a sweet snowball effect. SO, forward it to other Brown students and groups, get support, and tell people to email us so we can do a formal email with a lot of signatures. 🙂 Tim Horton’s in RI was sponsoring the event too, and after a huge backlash, they pulled their support and apologized. Let’s see if we can make this happen again with Blount!

If you or your subgroup/organization (remember, the Queer Alliance itself cannot sponsor any event; this is up to each individual subgroup) would like to be added to this e-mail let us know soon–we want to send this email and start circulating it before the event happens this upcoming Sunday!
——————-

To Whom It May Concern at Blount Fine Foods,

It has come to our attention that your organization is one of the sponsors for the National Organization for Marriage event being held this Sunday, August 16th 2009, at the Aldrich Mansion. While we understand that corporate philanthropy and good citizenship are part of Blount’s mission, and that in attempting to keep with said mission, your organization has a history of donating products to all local non-profits that request it for events, we feel it is impossible to construe donations for this event as “simple gestures of goodwill” with no ideological ramifications. Being a sponsor of an event has its obligations and implications, and thus we urge you to reconsider your support for NOM’s Marriage and Family Day.

Your website lists your non-discrimination policy, which covers many forms of diversity (including sexual orientation), and states that you believe “workforce diversity is essential to the company’s growth and long-term success.” Furthermore, your non-discrimination statement ends with “We further strive to apply these same principles to how we work with business partners, our industry as well as organizations out in the community.” How is it then acceptable to support an event that goes against everything you stand for in that statement and blatantly supports discrimination? How is it logical to espouse fairness and a need for diversity and simultaneously sponsor a fundraiser for the National Organization for Marriage?

This event has a clear religious affiliation and political agenda, which blatantly go against the ideals of non-discrimination and freedom of choice, and thus we feel your promotion of this event is deeply hypocritical. Your sponsorship directly marginalizes a sector of your workforce and clientele, while simultaneously condoning the mission of the National Organization for Marriage–to stand in the way of legalizing same-sex marriage on the basis of certain people’s religious beliefs.

Your decision to contribute to this event is directly relevant to us (members of the Brown University community), not just because our institution has people who identify as LGBTQ and are affected by NOM’s message and goals, but also because your company supplies Brown Dining Services with a variety of goods. If your sponsorship reflects your values and you choose to support the National Organization for Marriage’s efforts, we do not want our dollars going to your business and, by extension, anti-equality groups such as that.

We would appreciate that your company follow Tim Horton’s example: the company has pulled its support for the NOM Rhode Island event and has issued a statement on its website, in which it acknowledges that the event falls outside their sponsorship guidelines (which support fundraising events for non-profit organizations and registered charities, NOT those representing religious groups, political affiliates or lobby groups) and apologizes “for any misunderstanding or inconvenience” caused by the deal.

For all the reasons outlined above, we the undersigned oppose your decision to sponsor the National Organization for Marriage event this Sunday, August 16th, and urge you to reconsider your affiliation to it. In the event that you keep the sponsorship, we will work so that Brown University seriously reconsiders its patronage of your business.